© Descendants of Sir Joseph Dalton Hooker

Page 1

Camp Thibet [Tibet] frontier
Sikkim Himal
Sept[ember] 30/ [18]49
Carissimo Darwin
Motive for the 2d Edition  of Darwin's Geolog[y] of  S. America.
Stratification is vexation,  Foliation's twice as bad;  Where joints there be,  They puzzle me;  And Cleavage drives me mad.
Dear [Charles] Darwin
I have been reading your Geology of S[outh]. Am[erica]. with immense profit & pleasure, & have to own myself duly & truly ashamed of not having done so before.-- You are partly right & partly wrong in supposing that what I called stratification was your foliation I of course included the foliation in the stratification but in the Himal. both fol. & strat are so disturbed down to the individual leaves, that I never measure or judge except from the Strata by which I understand the individual masses if different differing in relative amount of Quartz Mica or Feldspar, & which strata are further foliated or stratified throughout. To begin at the beginning I [1 word crossed out, illeg.] premise that Gneiss Mica Schist & Clay slate are our only rocks except the intruded. Of these the Gneiss is all prevalent, the M.S. not

Page 2

unfrequent & the Clayslate rare & confined to the base of the outer range & bottoms of a few valleys. Do what I will & go where I will I can never find the C.S. but below the M.S & the MS. below the Gneiss -- Mc Lelland *1 writes me that he finds the same in the Curruckpore range (S. of the Ganges) substituting I think Hornblende for Mica schist. What is most puzzling of all; the clay slate overlies the recent sandstone with coal & coal fossils at the foot of the hills.! except there be some complete fold or overturn of a Mt 8000 ft high. I do not of course say it is so, but Hodgson & myself spent weeks down there in futile endeavors to unravel the real or apparent anomaly. I hope Thomson is coming to meet me in a couple of months & we will have another overhaul.
Now for your question -- the Strat. & foliation & Cleavage are throughout the Himal. parallel to & conformable to one another. I have no where found the foliation to be but to appearance a lesser stratification (in degree) & the cleavage is always along the Strat planes. On the other hand I never did look on foliation as a water action or a sure 

Page 3

index of the deposition of the folia from water but being a sneering skeptic[sic] I kept my heresy to myself & was not going to break my head against the stony gizzards of Deans & Doctors. HYPERLINK "http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/entry-1257" \l "mark-1257.f3" \o "1257.f3"  Not that I can any way explain foliation, even so partially as you do, but nobody once could make me believe that the convoluted individual folia of quartz mica & feldspar were due to pressure on such a paste as was soft enough to yield to the pressure & yet so consistent [1 word crossed out, illeg.] as that the elements should not intimately mix -- The double action of chemical aggregation & pressure I have always thought might accomplish it. Again the eye like concretions of both Quartz & feldspar, from an inch to a foot in diam. abound throughout the Gneiss, the laminae foliate round these ellipsees[sic], concentrically, & regularly -- folia of feldspar Quartz & mica -- Now the only other way of explaining these lenses is a partial fusion during metamorphosis but these are both either of Quartz & of Feldspar sometimes of both, a very different amount of heat is required for either, & the thin folia above & below & of both minerals could not stand that. Now where the plutonic rocks erupt, at 17 & 19000 ft I find it utterly impossible to distinguish at once which is the erupted <& which the>

Page 4

so called sedimentary rock., for the latter by metamorphosis looses its foliated character, & most distinctly erupted veins assume it, the tendency being to assume it in wavy lines & of the mica to concrete in broken i.e. non continuous plates, enclosing continuous plates beds an inch or so thick of Q. & F. always like beads soldered (or my lenses) [1 word crossed out, illeg.] together. The black lines here represent the micah. [Sketch of sediment layers appears here]
Again if my eyes did not deceive me I passed two days ago an enormous mass of Gneiss, traversed with a vein 4 feet broad, which vein was distorted & contorted far more than the Gneiss itself. Unluckily this was only a huge block recently came down from the Mts. & I could not be positive which was the vein--but that one stratified foliated rock enclosed another was as clear as in your sketch of the Rio rock.  [Sketch of rocks appear here with the labels "block of Gneiss" and "vein?"] A long story again arises out of the formation chrystallization & I take it rechrystallization of the Garnets & their arrangement now in veins

Page 5

& now in the sed. rock,--equally dispersed through all the mineral constituents in one metamorphosed area,--confined to the Feldspar & Quartz in another-- but there I am still further beyond my depth. Unfortunately it is extremely difficult to follow the Geology in its details of these Mts. In the first place the disturbance is too great, & in the next it is a most difficult country to explore.
I am not going to condescend to give you any more glacial action, I may just say that you could not be silent on the phemonomena I see here had you the remotest similarity to them in the Andes. I have been exploring two splendid live glaciers at 17 & 19000 ft & trace a perfect continuity of the moraine hills (500 & 1000 ft above the flanks & floors of the valleys) from 19000 down to 12000 ft.
I now write from 9000 ft, & could you see the lovely clear cut perfectly level terraces along both flanks of this (Lachoong) valley, abutting on a precipitous Mt 18000 ft high rising in steps 1000 ft above the floor, you would not be so sceptical[sic] of a poor ignoramus even on water action. A fatter man with less to do will come & reduce it all to feet & degrees & you will then believe.
I have heaps & heaps of things to remark upon in your S[outh]. Am[Erica]. Geolog[y]. in which I assure you I have been deeply interested, it is a most

Page 6

capital book in matter & extremely well written. How you would have laughed could you have seen me perusing it with avidity up at 16000 ft where I camped for 20 days, & where the volume came to my hands. Lying in bed huddled up in blankets with the smallest possible tip of one finger exposed to turn the pages, the skin off both nose & cheeks & holding the book with my hand cased in the blanket so awkwardly that it ever & anon bumped on to my face & deranged my spectacles.-- I still read in bed you see, & indeed the severity of the cold is such at these elevations, that even with a fire at the mouth of the tent you cannot work when the sun is down without always warming your fingers.
You say the late Dr Malcolmson *2 --I think he is alive if there be not two such men. entre nous he is said to drink -- Lord D. *3 has appointed him something in the Punjaub [Punjab].
I am charmed with your Geological part of [DIAG] Instructions *4, but have the same fault with yours as with all-- You do not give the prices of the required or recommended Instruments & books, & that,  however infra--dignit:, you may think it; you surely know is a most serious defect to travellers. Did I know the price of the hand levels of Adies *5 you recommend I would send for one in all probability.-- What on Earth can 

Page 7

any but a profound mineralogist understand by DelaBeches *6 Mineralogy? --f10 Pinnock's Catechism *7 would do ten times more good in the navy. All the rest I like very well. All want something. Herschells *8 especially neither gives rules for calculating Bar. heights nor recommends any, & yet who can have heard of the only good ones.? (Bessellsf13 in the Scientific Memoirs translated by Sabine, but which it almost requires mathematical powers to use.). There is still a terrible want of real practical books on Science, (like Simms Surveying) -- HYPERLINK "http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/entry-1257" \l "mark-1257.f14" \o "1257.f14"  Of books from which a traveller or foreign settler shall know, how to set about his work, I speak now from a good deal of experience & can answer for it that the two great obstacles to science at our possessions abroad, are, the want of correspondents in England & the inability to procure information as to the price & makers of very trifling utensils. People especially find or think they find curious things, take the trouble of sending a long letter & specimens to an enquirer in England & have neither thanks nor notice taken of letter or gift.-- Poor Williams *9


1. John McClellend.
2. John Grant Malcolmson.
3. Lord. Dalhousie (James Broun-Ramsay, 1st Marquess of Dalhousie) Governor --General of India.
4. The Admiralty manual, Herschel ed. 1849.
5. Alexander James Adie.
6. Henry Thomas De la Beche.
7. William Pinnock.
8. Friedrich Wilhelm Bessel.
9. David Hiram Williams.
10. The letter concludes here, though it is unsigned it is written in the hand of Joseph Dalton Hooker.

Please note that work on this transcript is ongoing. Users are advised to study electronic image(s) of this document where possible.

Powered by Aetopia