Hooker, Sir Joseph Dalton
JHC1025
The Camp, Sunningdale, Berkshire, United Kingdom
PRAIN LETTERS PRA f.151
Prain, Sir David
The Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
17-8-1892
© Descendants of Sir Joseph Dalton Hooker
Letters to D. Prain
The Trustees of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
English
Original MS
4 page letter over 1 folio
 
Transcript

I have at least 6 Pandani (Burmese & Malayan) of which I can make nothing. The specimens are far too imperfect to describe, & even were they better I should probably have named them as ever to be afterwards proved to be species named before from [1 word illeg.]. The condition botanically of the Scitaminea, great Aroids, Dioscoreas Smilaxes & of Bengal & the Circars{?] is a disgrace to Indian Botany. I allude especially to species named or described by Roxburgh, many of which might surely be absolutely identified, & others guessed it with a useful if not absolute approach to accuracy. The interests of Bengal Botany have been sacrificed to those of distant & more attractive regions. Griffith, led by a love of Morphological research & the ambition to publish a "Flora Indica" alone took up the big ugly things. I know the difficulties, & am not

Page 1


Aug 17/[18]92
THE CAMP, SUNNINGDALE.
Dear Mr. Prain
The two drawings of Orchids[?] safely arrived but in a very crumpled condition. Very many thanks for sending them. They are, as I expected, new species, & I [am] much amused[?] to get them figured -- but what with the loads figured & still to figure of the "Icones" plates, that are referred to in Fl. B. Ind., & those forms of the Calcutta Garden Annuals, I fear that I shall choke botanists[?] with Orchids[?]. Nevertheless the more I blunder away at the order the more sure I am, that plates, however bad, are alone really useful for specific determination. -- I will take care that the 2 drawings go back to you. The two boxes of Palms[?] arrived

Page 2

two days ago, & I will report[?] upon them soon. There are I fear [1 word illeg.] both species & numbers of Scortechinis of which I have seen nothing. Most of the Calami*1 now sent appear to me to be new to our collection. I am interested in what you say of Colletts big Rore[?]. I have not compared it with R. indica, but shall ask Baker about it, & let you know the result. I have just done Pandaneae for Fl. B.I.*2 - a weary & unsatisfactory job. It is really a scandal, that after all the lives, money & time, that have been invested in Botany in India, whole groups of common things should be left in deplorable disorder as far as I can discover King & Griffiths are the only men who have attempted the reduction of some of them to limits, generic & specific. i. e. since Roxburgh's times

Page 3

I have at least 6 Pandani (Burmese & Malayan) of which I can make nothing. The specimens are far too imperfect to describe, & even were they better I should probably have named them as ever to be afterwards proved to be species named before from [1 word illeg.]. The condition botanically of the Scitaminea, great Aroids, Dioscoreas Smilaxes & of Bengal & the Circars{?] is a disgrace to Indian Botany. I allude especially to species named or described by Roxburgh, many of which might surely be absolutely identified, & others guessed it with a useful if not absolute approach to accuracy. The interests of Bengal Botany have been sacrificed to those of distant & more attractive regions. Griffith, led by a love of Morphological research & the ambition to publish a "Flora Indica" alone took up the big ugly things. I know the difficulties, & am not

Page 4

blaming the present garden staff, who has done & is doing splendid work, but this is an old grievance. Roxburgh did get trusted many Scitamineae how is that no one since &c & Dmons if has got 1/2 [as] many of these, or added to them in Bengal? I have not heard of Dr King for some weeks -- he should have been at Kew long before this according to his earlier intentions. You will be greatly disappointed with my Palm work. I have never felt at home with them & Beccaris voluminous undigested Italian notes, whilst saddling me with specific names &c has left me to find diagnoses & characters. They are noble things but to set them out in a form suitable for a Concise Flora requires that they should have been fully & systematically described in detail beforehand -- I have made great use of the "leaflets" size[?][,] number & arrangement as great helps to the beginner; but one must be up in Palms to use any book on *3 Ichele[?] set to N Guinea[?] as far as I have disputed the Palms now cut. Jos. D Hooker [signature]

ENDNOTES


1. Botanical name: plural of Calamus[?] 2. Flora Brit India 3. The text that runs from here to the end of the letter is written vertically up the margin of page one of the letter.
Please note that work on this transcript is ongoing. Users are advised to study electronic image(s) of this document where possible.

Powered by Aetopia