Transcript
first-rate Botanist & is getting to the bottom of grasses, but treat them as you will they do not lend themselves to any but a complicated system of Tribes. I still cling to Paniceae & Poaceae [now called the Gramineae] as leading characters of the first impatians: he takes the spikelets articulate or not as his leading divisions.
Ever sincerely yours | Jos. D. Hooker [signature]
I have gone through the botany of the Kashian[?] Hills, & your essay on it with great interest, it is very instructive.
Sept[ember] 29/[18]98
The Camp. Sunningdale
My dear Prain
I have just received the batch of Impatiens announced in yours of Aug[ust] 29. It contains a lot of splendid specimens from Sikkim & elsewhere, but none of the tall Lachong species -- which I suppose to be Wallich's I. sulcata. A noble specimen of which I take to be the same is now flowering in my Garden, 5 feet high, a regular pyramid of leafy branches each truncated with a panicle of flowers. The capsule is clavate, quite like Royleana, -- there is unhappily none[?]
of these species[?] & their allies in Fl. Brit Ind., from my judging 3[?] immature fruits. I have now yours of Sept[ember] 5 to thank you for[.] I shall be very glad to see I. insignis as named by Hamilton -I cannot understand it´s being confounded with I. Balsamina, for which "Index Kewensis" is not, as you suppose it to be, responsible -- it stands as a species in that work. As to I. racemosa, I can there see 4 of that name in Index Kewensis. 3 referred to insignis, racemosa & leptoceras & one, that of DC.[?] stands. The whole matter will have to be worked up of course -- I shall be very glad to see the Javan & Chinese species & shall keep sketches of those we have not.
You are right in engaging collectors to confine[?] themselves to deficient[?] genera, & could not make a better beginning than with Impatiens & Balsams Didymocarpus[?] amongst herbaceous things, but do please see that flowers are at once placed in a pocketbook of bibulous paper, to be placed with the specimens when dried. King*1 is at Kew at last, staying with Clarke, I saw him yesterday, looking & feeling remarkably well, but not over strong. He is working at odds & ends for you, & is coming here in a week or so after seeing his son off for the Cape -- who had a short leave to go home & see his father. I am still worrying over Ceylon Grasses, cogitating[?] over Stapf's*2 views of the Tribes as now being printed in Flora Capensis. Stapf is certainly a
first-rate Botanist & is getting to the bottom of grasses, but treat them as you will they do not lend themselves to any but a complicated system of Tribes. I still cling to Paniceae & Poaceae [now called the Gramineae] as leading characters of the first impatians: he takes the spikelets articulate or not as his leading divisions.
Ever sincerely yours | Jos. D. Hooker [signature]
I have gone through the botany of the Kashian[?] Hills, & your essay on it with great interest, it is very instructive.
1. Presumably Sir George King (1840 --1909), Superintendent of the Royal Botanic Garden, Calcutta in 1871 – 1898. In 1898 King was succeeded at the Calcutta Botanical Gardens by Sir David Prain.
2. Otto Stapf (1857 -- 1933). Austrian botanist and taxonomist, based at Kew from 1890. Stapf wrote on the Gramineae (the grass family) in William Thiselton Dyer's edition of the Flora capensis (1898–1900).
Please note that work on this transcript is ongoing. Users are advised to study electronic image(s) of this document where possible.
Powered by Aetopia