Hooker, Sir Joseph Dalton
JHC148
The Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, United Kingdom
JDH/2/22/1/1 f.24-25
Gray, Asa
The Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
22-3-1867
© Descendants of Sir Joseph Dalton Hooker
Asa Gray Correspondence
The Trustees of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
English
Original MS
7 page letter over 2 folios
 

JDH writes to Asa Gray regarding Alphonse De Candolle [ADC] & his endorsement of Muller creating eponymous synonyms every time he adjust the limits of a species [see also JDH146]. Also comments on ADC's responsibility for the PRODROMUS SYSTEMATIS NATURALIS REGNI VEGETABILIS & on his opinion of ADC as a weak, vain man. Discusses his own recently completed work organising the order Cornaceae [for GENERA PLANTARUM] with reference to: a Himalayan Nyassa he found in Sikkim & Khasia, also mentions Benthamia, Garrya, Bursinopetalum, Mastixia, Torricellia, & Leranthaceae being relegated to Santalaceae. Cucurbitaceae are being printed & [George] Bentham is working on Umbelliferae & Araliaceae. JDH has been nominated for the Presidency of the British Association in Norwich, he fears it will interfere with his plans for an American trip. JDH & [Thomas] Thomson are to be jurors at the Paris [International Horticulture] Exhibition. Discusses the link between class & politics in Britain, predicts the future of political influence in the United States of America & points out the lack of representation of the British lower classes & aristocracy alike in the USA press. Notes that people & the press are more apt to complain about small problems, recently it was snow preparedness in London & bad ferry service in New York. Settlement of the 'Herbarium' affair & consequent payment will allow JDH to stay on in his position at Kew. Darwin is working hard at his 'big book' [THE DESCENT OF MAN[?]]. JDH wants to be informed about the progress of a young man who wrote an article on Agassiz.

Transcript

Editor of the whole. Bentham is I see a good deal disgusted; & I must say that I was not prepared for this it is so shabby & unfair to Mueller. When When he thought it was creditable, he took all the credit, when he gets nothing but blame, he throws it all on his poor subordinate. I do not know why, but I always did distrust A.D.C; not as a dishonest man, but as a weak & vain one. Of late he has wholly mistaken his priorities in the botanical world, & has I suspect only just found it out that he has so.
I have just done Corneae a pretty little order, as badly defined as any. Decartia is identified with Griselinia! of N.Z & I have a Himalaya Nyssa, which no one has found but myself (both in Sikkim & Khasia) it, embraces specifically both Agathisanthes & Ceratostachys of Blume *3 !!! Benthamia we knock on the head! Garrya we include Bursinopetalum = Mastixia, BL Torricellia comes into the order, which only differs from Caprifol by polypetaliae & from Araliaceae not at all but by habit! & not always that. Leranthaceae we shall relegate to Santalaceae neighbourhood.
Cucurbitaceae are printing[,] a child of serious labor & no little mistrust. Bentham has done Umbeliff[era]s from 160 genera only after all. Momentous reductions of course. He is now at Araliaceae. *4
I am stuck for the pres[idency] of Brit[ish]. Ass[ociation]. in Norwich in 1868. I held out against the appeal for 2 months and hoped I had fought off but the botanists have protested & so I must accept the nomination for election -- you know how

Page 1


Kew
March 22 [18]67
Dear Asa Gray,
Many thanks for your letter and the capital article on D.C *1 & the Euphorbiaceae I am sorry to say that A.D.C does not behave well about this matter. Bentham first remonstrated & D.C wrote back, (B has the letter) saying that it was done on his advice & responsibility; & defended it stoutly -- but have still kept at him, & now he writes to Bentham forgetting his former letter throwing the whole blame on Mueller *2, who he says "covers himself with disgrace" by it; & adds that he A.D.C takes no responsibility for the Prodromus at all! This is too bad, over & over again he has boasted of his care of & supervision of the Prodromus, it has been his "card" -- & he puts his uncle as

Page 2

Editor of the whole. Bentham is I see a good deal disgusted; & I must say that I was not prepared for this it is so shabby & unfair to Mueller. When When he thought it was creditable, he took all the credit, when he gets nothing but blame, he throws it all on his poor subordinate. I do not know why, but I always did distrust A.D.C; not as a dishonest man, but as a weak & vain one. Of late he has wholly mistaken his priorities in the botanical world, & has I suspect only just found it out that he has so.
I have just done Corneae a pretty little order, as badly defined as any. Decartia is identified with Griselinia! of N.Z & I have a Himalaya Nyssa, which no one has found but myself (both in Sikkim & Khasia) it, embraces specifically both Agathisanthes & Ceratostachys of Blume *3 !!! Benthamia we knock on the head! Garrya we include Bursinopetalum = Mastixia, BL Torricellia comes into the order, which only differs from Caprifol by polypetaliae & from Araliaceae not at all but by habit! & not always that. Leranthaceae we shall relegate to Santalaceae neighbourhood.
Cucurbitaceae are printing[,] a child of serious labor & no little mistrust. Bentham has done Umbeliff[era]s from 160 genera only after all. Momentous reductions of course. He is now at Araliaceae. *4
I am stuck for the pres[idency] of Brit[ish]. Ass[ociation]. in Norwich in 1868. I held out against the appeal for 2 months and hoped I had fought off but the botanists have protested & so I must accept the nomination for election -- you know how

Page 3

revolting all such distinctions are to me, having taken it I will fight it out & try & make the association less trifling & a better exposition of past scientific work, my great fear is that it will stop my American trip, on which I had set my heart -- this will depend on the time it takes place, which will not be settled till Dundee meeting this Sept:-- when my election will be proposed by the committee. I go to Paris next week as Juror on the Exhibin*5. -- with Thomson. No time for politics this letter.
I was amused with the Boston Advertiser pitching into the Pall Mall as representing 'the Governing Class.' I suppose the fashionable name misleads them with regard to the point at issue. The P. M. is logically right and B. A.

Page 4

clearly wrong. The error is in the B.A assuming that we are a "free nation." We are nothing of the sort, and the masses do not wish to be so -- they are engaged in the struggle for existence & care nought for freedom or politics so we have bribery & corruption in all our elections even down amongst the lower educated classes -- rampant. Take away bribery:-- & other extraneous motives for voting & scarce any would vote but the middle & upper middle classes. The more I compare our papers, the more I see, that you have no representation of the lower middle & lowest classes, except perhaps in n[ew]. York of the masses in short, any more than you have representation of our Aristocracy. You represent our middle &

Page 5

upper middle classes, who wield all the power with us as it is -- we are in no way comparable as a people; our political virtues & vices are quite different. Upon the whole you are the gainers: but it will not last:-- you will one day have a poverty stricken residence that will greatly increase in the same ratio as wealth at the other end -- a class who can't be educated, & who will vote for equal distribution of property & of all god's gifts, for no "men & betters" but for "god for us all,' & that god their bellies. Power & wealth will lapse into the hands of the strong with you, & laws will keep it

Page 6

there.
I also notice the Nation pitching into the Londoners for the state of London during the snow, & citing it as a proof of the lamentable inability of the English to improve it. & on same day in the New York paper were frightful letters on the state of the river & ferries of New York, where people were kept all day & could not cross. So we see in every day; it is the Beam & the mote, & so it will be to the end of the chapter.
The Herb[a]r[ium] affair is now settled, & I expect the money next week, not before it is wanted for my wants & position here, which I must

Page 7

have abandoned, were it not settled. I could not live on here without a complete alteration of all my household affairs, but on my present income, besides which I must have given up all my functions as head of my own & Henslow's family, & receiver of Botanists.
y[ou]rs | affe[ctionatel]y | Jos D Hooker [signature]
Darwin is working hard at big book. Keep your eye on that young man who wrote the article on Agassiz & advise me of his doings -- he is no ordinary man. I never saw him. I should not have forgotten his pretty wife!

ENDNOTES


1. The De Candolle family were authors of the botanical work Prodromus Systematis Naturalis Regni Vegetabilis. This refers to Alphonse De Candolle (28 October 1806 -- 4 April 1893) This letter lends itself to the wider conflict in botanical nomenclature in the 19th Century, with Bentham & Hooker central to this debate. In 1883, their Genera Plantarum contributes to the 'Kew Rule' consensus.
2. Possibly refers to Ferdinand Mueller, the Government Botanist of Victoria from 1853, who loaned his collection to Kew, enabling Bentham to compare the specimens with those in British and European herbaria.
3. Karl Ludwig Von Blume (1796--1862). German--Dutch botanist.
4. Referring to the progress of their Genera Plantarum.
5.Hooker was going to Paris to attend the International Horticultural Exhibition as a juror.

Please note that work on this transcript is ongoing. Users are advised to study electronic image(s) of this document where possible.

Powered by Aetopia